Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students – A Critique

Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students – A Critique

Garcete Marisol
Ciampichini Carolina

According to Bailey (2006) “those students who are not native speakers often find the written demands of their courses very challenging” (p. vii). In his book, the author aims to provide students with plenty of practice in certain genres that could help them to self-acquire competence in academic writing skills to be part of an academic writing community and also, to assist teachers who are concerned about their students’ writing progress.  
            Teachers in charge of students at beginner levels in Academic writing may find the book extremely useful. Not only has the author presented the information in a clear way,  but he also has provided new and valuable information for students who have to start writing academically. The book is comprehensibly organized in four parts each of which deals with certain writing skills.   For instance, “part 1: The Writing Process” (p. 3-60) tackles the issue of plagiarism and logical development and organization in essays. In “Part 2: Elements of writing” (p.65-114) the author approaches the need to use an argument style of writing, the use of paraphrasing and referencing. “Part 3: Accuracy in writing” (p. 119-182) provides practice on inaccuracies of verbs and vocabulary. Finally, “Part 4: Writing models” (p. 185-199) offers some models on certain basic writings. 
However, although the book would be suitable for secondary students or higher education beginners, it might fail to fulfill the requirements of teachers and students in the last years of college. The handbook would have been more useful at advanced levels if it had contained more complex genre writings and samples to be analyzed. All the above mentioned topics are comprehensibly introduced but they are vaguely delved into in the book. There is a considerable amount of practice but there are few references. In the “Avoiding Plagiarism” section (p.7) for example, the author should have included a clear guide with strategies for plagiarism avoidance so that students can use it when writing their own productions. They may also find it difficult to correct mistaken exercises because, although answers are provided in the book (p. 204-258) there are no clear explanations. The same may happen when students are doing the tests in the “Writing Tests” section (p. 201-203). 
Bailey’s book would have been more accurate if it had targeted a smaller range of audience. The author argues that the book “is a flexible course that allows students of all subjects and levels, from foundation to PhD, to practice those aspects of writing which are most important for their studies” (p. 6). However, different disciplines often have different writing requirements and this entails a more complex degree of knowledge and handling of writing skills that comprises a wide range of academic genres. 
             All in all, it can be stated that the handbook should be considered as a useful tool for students and teachers who are interested in polishing their academic writing performance at the beginning of higher education. However, a student that is in the last years of university would not find this book useful because it vaguely delves into practical writing skills and common difficulties in writing. 


 References

Bailey, S. (2006). Academic Writing: A handbook for international students (2nd ed.). Retrieved November 2013 from




No comments:

Post a Comment